Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bering-uClibc 4.x - User Guide - IPv6 Networking"
m |
Davidmbrooke (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Another option would be ISC DHCP4.1. Maybe we can consolidate all the various dhcp related packages with that? | Another option would be ISC DHCP4.1. Maybe we can consolidate all the various dhcp related packages with that? | ||
I'm not shure how actively dibbler is developed. --[[User:Kapeka|Kapeka]] 18:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC) | I'm not shure how actively dibbler is developed. --[[User:Kapeka|Kapeka]] 18:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have been testing dibbler a little. Its last update was 2010-09-17. My Buildtool configuration and the 0.8RC1 source code is in my "devel" area of CVS if anyone is interested: http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/leaf/devel/davidmbrooke/src/bering-uclibc4/source/dibbler/<br>[[User:Davidmbrooke|Davidmbrooke]] 14:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:40, 3 January 2011
The radvd package provides for "stateless" configuration as per RFC 2462 / RFC 4862.
What about "stateful" configuration as per RFC 3315, otherwise known as DHCPv6?
Seems that the "dibbler" software might a good choice for that: http://klub.com.pl/dhcpv6/
Davidmbrooke 17:49, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Another option would be ISC DHCP4.1. Maybe we can consolidate all the various dhcp related packages with that? I'm not shure how actively dibbler is developed. --Kapeka 18:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
I have been testing dibbler a little. Its last update was 2010-09-17. My Buildtool configuration and the 0.8RC1 source code is in my "devel" area of CVS if anyone is interested: http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/leaf/devel/davidmbrooke/src/bering-uclibc4/source/dibbler/
Davidmbrooke 14:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
